India Enters the Global Top 30 for Real-Estate Transparency: What Homebuyers Should—and Should Not—Infer
India has climbed to 26th in JLL’s 2026 Global Real Estate Transparency Index. Here is what stronger regulation and digitisation mean for homebuyers—and why due diligence still matters.
Published
The quick answer
India has entered the world’s top 30 real-estate markets for transparency for the first time, rising five places from 31st in 2024 to 26th in JLL’s 2026 Global Real Estate Transparency Index (GRETI). India was the most-improved market in Asia Pacific and moved into the index’s “Transparent” tier. The improvement is encouraging for property buyers, but it does not mean every project, title or transaction is automatically safe.
Key facts
- Global rank: 26th in 2026, up from 31st in 2024.
- Regional position: most-improved market in Asia Pacific.
- Regulatory ranking: reported to have improved from 37th to 19th.
- Drivers: maturing regulation, digitised land records, stronger transaction transparency, REIT expansion and sustainability disclosures.
- Important caveat: a national transparency ranking is not a legal certificate for an individual property.
What changed?
JLL’s index assesses transparency across areas including regulation and governance, transaction processes, market data, listed vehicles and sustainability. India’s climb reflects a broader institutionalisation of the property market: RERA frameworks have matured, land-record digitisation is progressing, transaction information is improving and institutional participation has deepened.
What does this mean for an ordinary homebuyer?
Better transparency can make it easier to obtain and compare information. In practical terms, buyers may benefit from more structured project disclosures, increasingly digital land and registration records, stronger regulatory trails and better market data. These improvements can also help lenders and their legal or technical teams verify a property more efficiently.
What it does not mean
- It does not guarantee that a particular developer will deliver on time.
- It does not prove that an individual property has clean and mortgageable title.
- It does not eliminate local approval, encumbrance, litigation or boundary risks.
- It does not make every project acceptable to every bank or housing-finance company.
- It is not a forecast that property prices will rise.
Buyer checklist despite the stronger ranking
- Verify the project and promoter on the applicable state RERA portal where registration is required.
- Match the seller’s title chain, survey/parcel information and registration records.
- Check encumbrances, litigation and required planning/building approvals.
- For under-construction homes, examine the promised completion timeline and regulatory disclosures.
- Ask your proposed lender whether the property meets its legal and technical requirements; “bank approved” should never replace your own due diligence.
- Budget for stamp duty, registration, taxes, maintenance and other acquisition costs in addition to the headline property price.
Why digitised land records matter
India is simultaneously expanding its digital land-record infrastructure through programmes such as DILRMP. Better-linked parcel, map and registration data can reduce information friction, but digitisation does not itself cure a defective title. A clean digital trail and a clean legal title are related objectives, not identical concepts.
Home-loan implication
A lender normally assesses two different things: the borrower and the property. Better transparency can improve the information available for the property side of underwriting, but the borrower still needs adequate income, repayment capacity, credit quality and documentation. Likewise, a financially strong borrower cannot make a legally defective property mortgageable.
What to watch next
The useful next indicators are continued RERA enforcement, state-level land-record integration, transaction-data quality, title and registration digitisation, and whether disclosure improvements reach smaller cities and individual residential transactions—not merely institutional commercial real estate.
FAQ
Does rank 26 mean buying property in India is now risk-free?
No. GRETI is a market-level transparency benchmark. Individual-property due diligence remains essential.
Does a more transparent market make home loans easier to obtain?
It can improve information and verification, but loan approval still depends on borrower eligibility and the lender’s legal and technical acceptance of the property.
Should buyers rely only on RERA and digital records?
No. They are valuable verification layers, but buyers should still examine title, encumbrances, approvals, contractual terms and lender requirements.
RiteAssetz takeaway: India’s transparency improvement is positive infrastructure for buyers and lenders. Use that better information aggressively—but do not confuse a better national ranking with permission to skip property-level due diligence.